Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Albizu v. AM PM HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC
as 1:2024cv22158
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Albizu
Defendant:
AM PM HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bond v. AM PM Health Solutions LLC
as 8:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bond
Defendant:
AM PM Health Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Matthew Verdiglione v. Bajwa Properties, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00760
Defendant:
AM/PM Veterinary Hospital, Bajwa Properties, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Matthew Verdiglione
Ramada Worldwide, Inc. v. AM/PM Hospitality Management Company et al
as 6:2013mc00033
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
AM/PM Hospitality Management Company and Richard Clair
Ramada Worldwide, Inc. v. AM/PM Hospitality Management Company et al
as 2:2013mc00013
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
AM/PM Hospitality Management Company and Richard Clair
BP West Coast Products, LLC v. Crossroad Petroleum, Inc., et al
as 12-55723
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC
Defendant-counter-plaintiff - Appellant:
CROSSROAD PETROLEUM, INC., 2 UNITED OIL, LLC, a California limited liability company (Store # 9728 ARCO), SHARINA ALLOUSH, individually, DBA SNBA Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation (Store # 9654 Thrifty , Store #9646 Thrifty) and others
Counter-defendant - Appellee:
THRIFTY OIL CO., INC.
Lhoir v. Food City et al
as 2:2009cv02534
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lhoir
Defendant:
Food City, Costco LLC, Arizona Title Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
