Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jerry Sharpe v. State of North Carolina
as 20-7094
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and LEA ANNE MURPHY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE SHARPE
Edward Little, et al v. Thomas Frederick, et al
as 20-30159
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS FREDERICK, KRISTIAN EARLES and MARK GARBER
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SHEILA ANN MURPHY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD LITTLE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
MURPHY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01663
NOVAK et al v. INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINSTRATION (FSSA) et al
as 1:2010cv00677
Defendant:
INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINSTRATION (FSSA), INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION and ANNE MURPHY
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. NOVAK and ROSEMARIE NOVAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Maine v. Murphy
as 2:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
State of Maine
Defendant:
Carol Ann Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Maine v. Murphy
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
State of Maine
Defendant:
Carol Ann Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Maine v. Murphy
as 2:2009cv00204
Plaintiff:
State of Maine
Defendant:
Carol Ann Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mesko, et al v. Cabletron Systems, et al
as 1:1997cv00542
Consol Plaintiff:
Philip Adler, Karen Borick, Richard Durr and others
Defendant:
All Defendants, Craig R. Benson, Cabletron Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, BGC Investment Club, BYSG Capital and others
Consol Defendant:
David J. Kirkpatrick, Donald F. McGuinness and Don Reed
Interested Party:
Timothy M. Smith, Sr.
Notice Only:
US District Court - RI, Clerk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Goldberg v. Murphy
as 1:2008cv21285
Plaintiff:
Michael I. Goldberg and Michael I. Goldberg
Defendant:
Judith Ann Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
