Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Hitt v. Frost-Arnett Company Inc
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hitt
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Arnett v. Traditions Health LLC
as 24-636
Respondent:
REBECCA ARNETT, an dividual and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
TRADITIONS HEALTH LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv24744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Perry v. Frost-Arnett Company Inc
as 5:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Shelia Perry
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wilson et al v. Austin III et al
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Wilson, Members of the Armed Forces for Liberty, Michael Groothousen and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Scott Wells, Annmarie Acevedo, William Timothy Adams and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pritish Vora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
