Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Carlisle v. The National Security Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
The National Security Group, Inc., Walter P. Wilkerson, Fred D. Clark, Jr. and others
Mark Stinson v. John Yates, et al
as 21-3365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Stinson
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, FCC Low, Blair, Camp Unit Manager, B.O.P., Randle, Lieutenant, B.O.P. and others
Gattineri, et al v. Town of Lynnfield, Masschusetts, et al
as 21-1729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY GATTINERI and BOSTON CLEAR WATER COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNNFIELD, MA, PHILIP B. CRAWFORD, Chairman, Lynnfield Board of Selectmen, JAMES M. BOUDREAU, Lynnfield Town Administrator and others
Crawford v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as INN/3:13-cv-00478
Plaintiff:
Austin B Crawford, IV
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
USA v. Michael Crawford
as 12-30195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. CRAWFORD
Mandel v. Crawford et al
as 3:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Henry Mandel
Defendant:
James B. Crawford, Robert H. Foglesong, Richard M. Gabrys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Firefighters' Retirement System of Louisiana v. Massey Energy Company, et. al.
as 5:2010cv00776
Plaintiff:
Firefighters' Retirement System of Louisiana
Defendant:
Massey Energy Company, Don L. Blankenship, Baxter F. Phillips, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Macomb County Employees' Retirement System v. Massey Energy Company, et. al.
as 5:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
Macomb County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Massey Energy Company, Don L. Blankenship, Baxter F. Phillips, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gary B. Crawford v. Fibreboard Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91635
Defendant:
Fibreboard Corporation
Plaintiff:
Gary B. Crawford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
