Cases 1 - 10 of 19
D. Bart Rockett v. The Honorable Eric Eighmy
as 21-3903
Plaintiff / Appellee:
D. Bart Rockett, as next friend of his minor children, K.R. and B.R.
Defendant / Appellant:
The Honorable Eric Eighmy
USA v. Dana Stewart
as 21-1916
Defendant / Appellant:
DANA STEWART, a/k/a BEDROCK, a/k/a B.R.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
B.R. v. F.C.S.B.
as 21-1005
Defendant / Appellant:
T.B., J.F., J.O. and others
Defendant:
MIKE AND MARY ROES 1-15
Plaintiff / Appellee:
B.R.
B.R. v. St. Marks Medical Group et al
as 1:2020cv02649
Defendant:
St. Marks Medical Group, Edmund Soleymani, Andrew D. Black and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Riley and B.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Natasha Beljon et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Plaintiff:
T. B.R., Natasha Beljon and Stephen Regan
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does and Mark Hwang
B.R.-S.O.H. LLC (Sons of Hemp) et al v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2016cv11492
Defendant:
Detroit, City of
Plaintiff:
B.R.-S.O.H. LLC (Sons of Hemp), Ronald Jones, II, Miles Green Acres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.R.-S.O.H. LLC (Sons of Hemp) et al v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2016cv11491
Defendant:
Detroit, City of
Plaintiff:
B.R.-S.O.H. LLC (Sons of Hemp), Ronald Jones, II, Miles Green Acres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAIYA et al v. FRACTIONAL VILLAS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
B.R., S.R., SHEVELEV TAIYA and others
Defendant:
FRACTIONAL VILLAS, INC., BARBARA VICINO, ROBERT VICINO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
B.R. Brookfield Commons No. 1, et al v. Valstone Asset Management, LLC
as 13-2241
Debtor - Appellant:
In the Matter of: B.R. BROOKFIELD COMMONS NO. 1 LLC and B.R. BROOKFIELD COMMONS NO. 2 LLC
Appellee:
VALSTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, in its capacity as Attorney in fact for TS7-E Grantor Trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
