Cases 1 - 10 of 124
USA v. Cartagena-Guevara
as 24-10390
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fidel Cartagena-Guevara, also known as Fidel Cartagena Guevaras
Cartagena-Ortiz v. Garland
as 24-358
Petitioner:
ROSA ELENA CARTAGENA-ORTIZ, MAYTE ALEJANDRA LEMA-CARTAGENA and DEREK EFRAIN LEMA-CARTAGENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Cartagena
as 23-1871
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE CARTAGENA, t/n Jose Ruben Cartagena-Rodriguez
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03607
Petitioner:
Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
as 4:2023mc01641
Petitioner:
Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
Defendant:
McDermott International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
United States v. Daniel Cartagena-Rodriguez
as 23-3081
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Cartagena-Rodriguez
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al v. Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
as 1:2023cv04825
Petitioner:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and CB&I UK Limited
Respondent:
Refinera de Cartagena S.A.S.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Rivera et al v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 1:2022cv20968
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Rivera, Alishia Cartagena, Doreen Endress and others
Defendant:
Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC, Pingora Loan Servicing, LLC and Bayview Asset Management, LLC
Intervenor:
Anthony Oglesby and Teresa Oglesby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rosalva Pena-Cartagena v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1184
Petitioner:
ROSALVA VERONICA PENA-CARTAGENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Barrera-Cartagena v. Garland
as 21-666
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS BARRERA-CARTAGENA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
