Cases 1 - 10 of 1,283
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hemp Quarters 605 LLC v. Noem et al
as 3:2024cv03016
Plaintiff:
Hemp Quarters 605 LLC
Defendant:
Governor Kristi Noem, Attorney General Marty Jackley and Casey Deibert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as TXN/3:24-CV-00757
Plaintiff:
Petroski, Alex Petroski, Andrew March and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Wright et al v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Josh Wright, Casey Wright and Michael Wright
Defendant:
Thomas Vilsack, Michael Watson, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HOWELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
SHASTA CASEY HOWELL and SHASTA CASEY HOWELL MCCALLUM
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Howell v. US
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
SHASTA CASEY HOWELL, aka Shasta Casey Howell McCallum
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
