Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc et al v. Bluestone Coke, LLC
as 2:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc and GASP
Defendant:
Bluestone Coke, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
United States v. EES Coke Battery, LLC
as 2:2022cv11191
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
EES Coke Battery, LLC
Pabst et al v. The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company et al
as 1:2022cv01124
Plaintiff:
Wesley Pabst and Katherine Pabst
Defendant:
The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company, WEC Energy Group Inc. and The Broydrick Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
United States of America v. Gray (Christopher Coke)
as 21-1932
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hughie Gray, AKA Hugh Goldson, AKA Michael Grant, Sharon Hinds, Lloyd Reid, AKA Kevin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Michael Coke, AKA President, AKA Michael Christopher Coke, AKA Paul Christopher Scott, AKA Shortman, AKA Duddus, AKA Presi, AKA General
Mott v. U.S.D.A. et al
as 4:2021cv01464
Plaintiff:
Terrance Mott and Terrence Mott
Defendant:
U.S.D.A., U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, U.S. Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carpentertown Coal and Coke Co, et al v. Director Office of Workers Com, et al
as 20-3617
Petitioner:
BIRMINGHAM FIRE INSURANCE CO and CARPENTERTOWN COAL AND COKE CO INC
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ANTHONY S. DEPETRO
Frederick Banks v. Republic of Sudan
as 20-6618
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MAYA ENERGY and others
Petitioner:
R. KELLY, SIX HIGH SCHOOLERS, in Gary, Indiana, GLEN JONES, Pinaca, NV home and car bomber and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS, next friend thereto
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
