Cases 1 - 10 of 47
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv12652
Defendant:
Sanofi GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RDC Liquidating Trust, by and through its trustee, Advisory Trust Group LLC, MLI Rx LLC, Burlington Drug Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02960
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Interested Party:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Auglaize County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45570
Plaintiff:
Auglaize County Board of County Commissioners
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Catawba Nation v. Endo Health Solutions, Inc., et al
as 1:2020op45234
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Anda, Inc., Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Catawba Nation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019op46095
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Mylan Specialty, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Pipefitters Local 636 Insurance Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Klamath Tribes v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45786
Defendant:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,, Beverly Sackler, Advantage Logistics and others
Plaintiff:
Klamath Tribes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Township of Barnegat v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries LTD et al
as 1:2019op45925
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Advantage Logistics, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Township of Barnega and Township of Bernegat
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
