Cases 1 - 10 of 51
USA v. Perez-Jacome
as 24-50306
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eres De Jesus Perez-Jacome
Cecilia Maria Valenzuela Serrano v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09155
Petitioner:
Toyota Financial Services, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A. INC and Cecilia Maria Serrano
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Maria Valenzuela Serrano, Callie Williams, Timothy Johnson and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Credit Corporation doing business as Toyota Financial Services and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
USA v. Gonsalez
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Reinaldo Fuentes Gonsalez, also known as Jesus Perez-Garcia
USA v. Jesus Garcia
as 22-50314
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESUS PEREZ GARCIA
US v. Valdez
as 22-1894
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR VALDEZ, a/k/a Arnaldo Lopez, a/k/a Jose Ocasio, a/k/a Jose Altagracia, a/k/a Jorge Figueroa, a/k/a Hector Nunez, a/k/a Jesus Perez, a/k/a Ramon Alvarez Vegas, a/k/a Hector Bolivar Valdez Nunez, a/k/a Boli
Perez-Garcia v. Garland
as 22-9543
Petitioner:
JESUS PEREZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Mario Sanchez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1391
Petitioner:
MARIO JESUS PEREZ SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Perez-Leiva v. Garland
as 21-60935
Petitioner:
Manuela De Jesus Perez-Leiva and Jorge Marubi Regalado-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
United States v. Manuel Perez-Echeverria
as 21-3466
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel De Jesus Perez-Echeverria, also known as Chuy
USA v. Perez-Solis
as 21-10904
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus Perez-Solis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
