Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Christopher Wells v. Marcela Mateo, et al
as 20-12798
Defendant / Appellee:
FBI SWAT TEAM ATLANTA GEORGIA, In Individual and Official Capacities, JOSEPH BUTLER, Glynn County Police, STEPHANIE R. MCDONALD, Attorney, in Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER UNDRAY WELLS
US v. Joseph Butler
as 20-6113
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH BUTLER, a/k/a Monkey
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Joseph Butler
as 19-6293
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH BUTLER, a/k/a Monkey
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Estrada
as 16-4057
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frank Estrada, AKA The Terminator, AKA Big Dog, AKA Frankie Estrada, AKA Mustard, Isaias Soler, AKA Eso, Nelson Carrasquillo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edward Estrada, AKA French Fry, AKA Fry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BUTLER v. SENEX SERVICES CORP. et al
as 1:2015cv00381
Defendant:
BALEKIAN HAYES, PLLC and SENEX SERVICES CORP.
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Butler
as 1:2012mc91199
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Joseph Butler
Joseph Butler v. A.m. Lockett & Co., Ltd., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-78745
Defendant:
A.m. Lockett & Co., Ltd
Plaintiff:
Joseph Butler
Allen et al v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2008cv04302
Plaintiff:
Alton Allen, Alton Allen, Adrian Anthony Andrews and others
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0742 Suits in Admiralty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
