Cases 1 - 7 of 7
68th Street Site Work Group v. Alban Tractor Co., Incorporated
as 23-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
68TH STREET SITE WORK GROUP
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBAN TRACTOR CO., INCORPORATED, C & I LEASING INCORPORATED, RUKERT TERMINALS CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC., A&M (2015) LLC, ABACUS CORPORATION and others
68th Street Site Work Group v. Airgas, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03385
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company Inc., Lear Corporation, Norris Automotive Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
68th Street Site Work Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 Comp Environ Recovery Comp & Liability Act (CERCLA) - Civil Proceedings
Laborers' Local 231 Pension Fund et al v. Pharmerica Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Laborers' Local 231 Pension Fund and Daniel Riordan
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corporation , Frank E. Collins , W. Robert Dahl, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Guttman v. Visa Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv10321
Plaintiff:
Guttman and YEHUDA GUTTMAN
Defendant:
Visa Inc, Mail.Ru Group, Visa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Aguila v. Parsons, et al
as 1:2015cv20722
Plaintiff:
Rafael Newton Aguila
Defendant:
Robert Ralph Parsons, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., Silver Lake Management, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund v. Barclays Capital Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01064
Plaintiff:
Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund v. Barclays Capital Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01064
Plaintiff:
Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
