Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Team Cam, LLC v. Reliable Contracting Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Team Cam, LLC
Defendant:
Reliable Contracting Company, Inc., Francis O. Day Co., Inc., Allan Myers MD, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A. v. PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Defendant:
PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH, LLC and SIGNATURE MD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES v. PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
ADVANTAGE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
PARAGON PRIVATE HEALTH and SIGNATURE MD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
68th Street Site Work Group v. Alban Tractor Co., Incorporated
as 23-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
68TH STREET SITE WORK GROUP
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBAN TRACTOR CO., INCORPORATED, C & I LEASING INCORPORATED, RUKERT TERMINALS CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC., A&M (2015) LLC, ABACUS CORPORATION and others
68th Street Site Work Group v. Airgas, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03385
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company Inc., Lear Corporation, Norris Automotive Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
68th Street Site Work Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 Comp Environ Recovery Comp & Liability Act (CERCLA) - Civil Proceedings
Daniel S. Gladstone et al v. Matthew A. Jacobson et al
as 2:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Gladstone and Longeviti Health, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew A. Jacobson and Signature MD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Antitrust Litigation
La Jolla Spa MD, Inc. v. Avidas Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 2:2022mc00015
Plaintiff:
La Jolla Spa MD, Inc.
Defendant:
Avidas Pharmaceuticals, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Julie Chovanes
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party:
Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court:
Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff:
Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant:
Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae:
The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader:
MNZ Inc
Respondent:
Visa Inc.
Intervenor:
Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant:
St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re:
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Joseph Dang v. David Pontier, et al
as 21-55032
Counter Claimant:
DAVID PONTIER, an individual
Defendant:
TEOCO CORPORATION GROUP BENEFIT PLAN, a self funded group health plan, PAUL E. KIM, MD INC., a California corporation, TEOCO CORPORATION, a Deleware Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
GLENN C. NUSBAUM, PAUL E. KIM and KEVIN YOO
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANG, an individual, DBA Law Office of Joseph Dang
Joseph Dang v. David Pontier, et al
as 20-55712
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID PONTIER, an individual
Defendant:
GLENN C. NUSBAUM, PAUL E. KIM, TEOCO CORPORATION, a Deleware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH DANG, an individual, DBA Law Office of Joseph Dang
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
