Cases 1 - 10 of 245
McRae v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Margie McRae
Defendant:
Brandon Vaughn and Patricia Austell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Earth Island Institute, et al v. USFS, et al
as 22-16751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and MARGIE B. DEROSE
COYER v. USA
as 1:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
MARGIE COYER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00817
Plaintiff:
Daffern, Brycen Daffern, David Dahl and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00761
Plaintiff:
Jones, Matthew Jones, Micheal Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Crystal Rivers v. United States of America
as 21-2408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRYSTAL VL RIVERS
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, BILL TALBOTT, VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION and others
Defendant:
KAREN DEER, MARYLOU PRILLIMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Jose Diaz et al v. Pauline Macareno et al
as 2:2021cv09678
Plaintiff:
Jose Diaz, Jose Alberto Diaz, Jr. and Jose Diaz, Sr
Defendant:
Pauline Macareno, Margie Candelaria, Erik Candelaria and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
