Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Johnson v. United States of America
as 24-1221
Petitioner:
MARK JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Webb
as 24-4043
Plaintiff:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant:
MICHAEL CALDWELL, Ogden City Mayor, MARK JOHNSON, Ogden City Chief Administrator, JAY LOWDER, Ogden City Public Service Director and others
JOHNSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02069
Petitioner:
MARK JOHNSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Boyd v. Northern Biomedical Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
Robert Boyd
Defendant:
Northern Biomedical Research, Inc., Shane Woods, Dean Haan and others
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Zeller v. Northern Biomedical Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jillynne Zeller
Defendant:
Northern Biomedical Research, Inc., Shane Woods, Dean Haan and others
Interested Party:
Robert DeWit
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Hung Dang v. Kimberly Moore, et al
as 21-36040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNG DANG
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY MOORE, M.D., MARK ADAMS, M.D., Former Chief Medical Officer for FHS, KETUL PATEL, Chief Executive Officer for FHS and others
Defendant:
MARK JOHNSON, MQAC member, WILLIAM M. BRUEGGEMANN, MQAC member, RICK J. GLEIN, MQAC staff attorney and others
Mark Johnson v. Mark Sevier
as 21-3239
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
