Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ionel Iancu v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1883
Petitioner:
IONEL IANCU, AMAR IANCU, FLORIN HORNEA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Sierra Bezerra v. Garland
as 23-6929
Petitioner:
PAULA MIRELA SIERRA BEZERRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Razvan Pop, et al
as 23-101
Petitioner:
In re: RAZVAN S. POP, MARIA POP and R.S.P EXPRESS, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
NA TRUCK REPAIR, LLC
Respondent:
MIRELA USELMANN, dba Sapphire Trucking, Inc., GABRIEL BICLEA, dba MB Trucking, Inc., ION GUTU, dba GPA Trucking, Inc. and others
Simona Tanasescu v. Matthew Kremer, et al
as 20-55326
Defendant / Appellee:
MIRELA MOSOIU, ZOE CRISTINA SUCIU, CRISTIAN COROIAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMONA TANASESCU
Uselmann et al v. Pop et al
as 2:2019cv13652
Plaintiff:
Ion Gutu, Mirela Uselmann, Gabriel Biclea and others
Defendant:
Maria Pop, NA Truck Repair LLC, R.S.P Express Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Simona Tanasescu v. Matthew Kremer, et al
as 19-56350
Defendant / Appellee:
MIRELA MOSOIU, ZOE CRISTINA SUCIU, DORIN COROIAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMONA TANASESCU
Mirela v. United States of America
as 19-3366
Petitioner / Appellant:
Manea Ortansa Mirela
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Simona Tanasescu et al v. Matthew Kremer et al
as 8:2017cv01513
Defendant:
The State Bar of California, E. Daniel Bors, Jr., Matthew M. Kremeer, The Offices of and others
Plaintiff:
Simona Tanasescu and Simona Tanasescu s Child
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sofokli Gazeli, et al v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-3270
Petitioner:
SOFOKLI GAZELI and MIRELA GAZELI, aka Mirela Goxhaj
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General
Veronica Mirela Morrow v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 15-1388
Petitioner:
Veronica Mirela Morrow
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
