Cases 1 - 10 of 774
Duenas Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3421
Petitioner:
LUCIA IVETTE DUENAS ROSALES, MARIA JOSE LOPEZ DUENAS and NATALY ESMERALDA LOPEZ DUENAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Merchan-Berrezueta v. Garland
as 24-1452
Petitioner:
FABIAN PATRICIO MERCHAN-BERREZUETA, JHENNY NATALI ALVAREZ-ALVAREZ, MICKEL JOEL MERCHAN-ALVAREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Grant v. Adult Protective Service
as 24-1435
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH GRANT, GRACE GRANT, ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Defendant:
Police Officer NATALIE BALLATO, Shield #13280, Police Officer JOSEPH DELLIGATTI, Shield #13106, Lt. WILLIAM FIELDS and others
Mather v. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Disability Determination Services et al
as 0:2024cv01894
Plaintiff:
Natalie A. Mather
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Disability Determination Services, Frank Gilbertson and Lisa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isom v. Amazon.com
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tyesha Natalie Isom
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United Energy Workers Healthcare, LLC v. Cavallaro et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
United Energy Workers Healthcare, LLC
Defendant:
Natalie Cavallaro and Nuclear Worker Solutions, LLC
Parizer et al v. AJP Educational Foundation Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Maya Parizer, Adin Gess, Noach Newman and others
Defendant:
AJP Educational Foundation Inc. and National Students for Justice in Palestine
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Antiterrorism Act of 1990
Suffolk County v. Corrado
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
SUFFOLK COUNTY, DIANE ZIELENSKI, NATALIE WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CORRADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
