Cases 1 - 10 of 118
United States v. Trevor Sparks
as 23-3266
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Trevor Scott Sparks, also known as Nephew
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Ruther (Baker)
as 23-6361
Defendant:
KEITH RUTHER, ERIC BRADLEY, LEANDRO JONES and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EARNEST BAKER, Q. and Slay
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nephew Mini Market, LLC. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv02318
Plaintiff:
Nephew Mini Market, LLC. and Nadeem Asghar
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Smith+Nephew
as 1:2021cv00466
Petitioner:
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Respondent:
Smith+Nephew
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Smith+Nephew
as 1:2021oe00466
Petitioner:
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Respondent:
Smith+Nephew
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
US v. Arnold Burgess
as 21-6402
Defendant / Appellant:
ARNOLD BURGESS, a/k/a True, a/k/a T, a/k/a Nephew
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ruther
as 21-54
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Printice Latson, AKA Cuda, Matthew Latson, AKA Ponytail, Eric Bradley, AKA Little E. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Keith Ruther, AKA Kiki
Wayland Kirkland v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5377
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States of America, Craig E. Cole, past fired court appointed lawyer for Petitioner, fired retained attorney of record for Petitioner's nephew, Coby Joe Pearson, Respondent in paternity case no. 2020-DM-05, Steven A. Jensen, Attorney for Chasity Nicole Gochenour in paternity case no. 2020-DM-05 and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wayland Dee Kirkland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
