Cases 1 - 10 of 14
In Re: Hughes
as 23-8029
Respondent:
PAUL S. HUGHES
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Andrew Chien v. Edward Robbins, Jr.
as 22-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW CHIEN
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD ANSON ROBBINS, JR., FREDERICK G. ROCKWELL, III, WENDY S. HUGHES and others
Chien v. Robbins et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Defendant:
Frederick G. Rockwell, III, Karl S. Leonard, Wendy S. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Mellon et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2019cv11767
Plaintiff:
Craig Centro, Harold Hughes, Rosemarie Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic Of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Mark Hughes v. Robert Carter, et al
as 19-1967
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, Comm., KEITH BUTTS, Warden, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK S. HUGHES
Andrew Chien v. Commonwealth of VA
as 18-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW CHIEN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VA, MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY and others
Chien v. Commonwealth of VA et al
as 1:2017cv00677
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Commonwealth of VA , Mark R. Herring , Chesterfield County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ahern et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01347
Plaintiff:
Kylie E Ahern , Matthew J Ahern , Carol E Babock and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Saunders v. Burns et al
as 3:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michael J. G. Saunders
Defendant:
Craig M. Burns and Wendy S. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HUGHES v OBAMA et al
as 1:2012mc00027
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, BARACK OBAMA and ZINK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
