Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MOORE v. SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MOORE
Defendant:
SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 41 Daiquiri & Foods, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
41 Daiquiri & Foods, LLC doing business as 41 Daiquiri & Foods, LLC, Timothy Moore and Captain Munnerlyn
Timothy Moore v. AdMediary LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Timothy Moore
Defendant:
AdMediary LLC and Tort Experts LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carol Hrdlicka, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 21-12690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL HRDLICKA, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Hrdlicka, CAROL SHABLESKY, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Edward Shablesky, SHARLENE HAYES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Briggs Sports Bar et al
as 2:2021cv10427
Defendant:
Briggs Sports Bar, Rocco Tossone and Timothy Moored
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States v. Timothy Moore
as 19-1226
Defendant / Appellant:
Timothy Moore
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Timothy Moore, et al v. Hartford Financial Services, et al
as 19-1142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERESA MOORE, Guardians of Rachael Moore, an Incapacited Person and TIMOTHY MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUMBULL INSURANCE CO and HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC, DBA Hartford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
