Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crystal Molnar et al v. Richard Branson et al
as 8:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MOLNAR and CLEVELAND TUBBS
Defendant:
RICHARD BRANSON, MICHAEL COLGLAZIER, RAYMOND MABUS and others
Tubbs v. Venettozzi
as 24-841
Plaintiff:
DARNELL TUBBS
Defendant:
DONALD G. UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, PAUL P. WOODRUFF, Deputy Superintendent of Security at Upstate Correctional Facility, WAYNE GARLAND, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Barry Tubb v. Paramount Pictures Corporation
as 2:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Barry Tubb
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Arnold v. US
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARNOLD, SUSAN BOLEK, H. DRAKE GEBHARD and others
Plaintiff:
B&D FARMS, INC., H. KENT EUHUS LIVING TRUST, DIANA EUHUS LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Government App Solutions, Inc. v. City of New Haven, et al
as 23-15708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GOVERNMENT APP SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW HAVEN, KEVIN M. JOHNSON, NICOLE WEST and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ANDERSON and others
USA v. Tubbs
as 23-30136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Javaris Marquez Tubbs
USA v. Tubbs
as 23-30133
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Javaris Marquez Tubbs
USA v. Darryl Coleman
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRYL E. COLEMAN, a/k/a T, a/k/a Tubbs, a/k/a D
US v. Arthur McQueen, Jr.
as 22-4104
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR ALEXANDER MCQUEEN, JR., a/k/a Tubb
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
