Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Godfrey v. Costner, et al.
as 5:2024cv02547
Plaintiff:
Diane K Godfrey
Defendant:
Kevin Costner, Harrison Ford, Spencer Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv10869
Plaintiff:
Mileathia Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Jeffrey Nail and Alfred Washington
Daniels v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2023cv13095
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daniels
Defendant:
US Postal Service, US Postmaster General and John Doe
Nguyen v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv03801
Plaintiff:
Jackhai D Nguyen and Jackhai Nguyen
Defendant:
US Postal Service and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 0409 Postal Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NLRB v. USPS
as 22-1049
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party:
HEATHER L. TAYLOR, NLRB Specialist, ROBERT A. PEROCCHI, JR., President, American Postal Workers Union, Bangor, LAURA A. SACKS, Regional Director and others
US v. Bradshaw
as 21-1270
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH BRADSHAW
Interested Party:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Ronald Livingston v. Louis DeJoy, et al
as 21-55114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD LIVINGSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, JASON JACKSON, Attorney for US Postal Service and ELIZABETH ESPARZA CERVANTES
Johnson v. US Postal Service
as 20-1088
Defendant / Appellee:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Tavares v. IRS, et al
as 19-2144
Defendant / Appellee:
MASS HIRE, Tauton Adminstrator, DONALD MCENTIRE, HOUSE ADMINSTRATION COMMUNITY COUNSELING, of Bristol County CCBC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D. TAVARES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
