Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 819
FARRELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00731
Petitioner: ANTHONY FARRELL
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff: RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant: DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff: Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant: The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ambrosetti v. Oregon Catholic Press, et al.
as 24-2270
Plaintiff: VINCENT A. AMBROSETTI
Defendant: OREGON CATHOLIC PRESS and BERNADETTE FARRELL
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff: Keith Dial
Defendant: Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
USA v. Kelly
as 24-20149
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Randy Farrel Kelly
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant: CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff: RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant: DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FARRELL et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff: MICHAEL FARRELL, BRENDA HYPES, DEREK SULLIVAN and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?