Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brett Noble, et al v. Nevada Checker Cab Corporation, et al
as 16-16573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRETT NOBLE, AMANDA FOWLER and LARRY TRAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA CHECKER CAB CORPORATION, DBA Checker Cab Company, HENDERSON TAXI, WHITTLESEA BLUE CAB COMPANY and others
Wallen et al v. St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission et al
as 4:2015cv01432
Plaintiff:
Marsha Robyn Wallen, Patrick Andert, Patrick Fox and others
Defendant:
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission, Eyasu Asfaw, Louis P. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The Yellow Cab Company et al v. Upper Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02764
Plaintiff:
The Yellow Cab Company , Checker Cab Association, Incorporated , Sun Taxicab Association, LTD and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Mekuria Gebremariam , Dereje Gugsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Greenwich Taxi, Inc et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00733
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Greenwich Taxi, Inc , Casino Cab Company, Inc. , Curtin Motor Livery Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cardinalli v. Superior Court of California for the County of Monterey et al
as 5:2012cv06356
Plaintiff:
Sal J Cardinalli
Defendant:
Superior Court of California for the County of Monterey, The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, John T Cardinalli, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Paul v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2008mc00505
Plaintiff:
Anna Mae Paul
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, City of Houston, Charlie Lee Jackson and others
Cotton v. Galveston Yellow Cab Company et al
as 3:2007mc00009
Plaintiff:
Robert L Cotton
Defendant:
Galveston Yellow Cab Company and Raymond Groh
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
