Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Letha Kemp v. Resurgent Capital Services, et al
as 13-2508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LETHA KEMP
Defendant - Appellee:
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, QUICKEN LOANS, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York and others
Davis v. Home Loan Services-First Franklin Loan Services et al
as 8:2013cv01780
Plaintiff:
Nicole Monique Davis
Defendant:
Home Loan Services-First Franklin Loan Services, Lasalle Bank National Association-Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificates, Banking Branch and Trust Company, Bank of America Home Loans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Ericson et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
as 4:2013cv01288
Plaintiff:
David D Ericson and Rosemary Ericson
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services, LP , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Kemp v. Resurgent Capital Services et al
as 2:2013cv11794
Plaintiff:
Letha Kemp
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services , Quicken Loans , Bank of New York Mellon and others
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, SERVICER FOR LVNV FUNDING, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al
as 3:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, SERVICER FOR LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and DAVID M. BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Alvarez v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv23505
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Alvarez
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Resurgent Capital Services, LP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Mathews et al
as 8:2007cv00422
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Raymond A. Mathews, Pauline E. Mathews, Adam R. Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
