Cases 11 - 20 of 37
LEE v. U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE
as 1:2017cv04570
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE
Defendant:
U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Armstrong v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
as 4:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Sabrina L. Armstrong
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McFarland et al v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage et al
as 2:2016cv10141
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McFarland and Richard B McFarland
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Home Mortgage and Michigan State Housing Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bertschy-Gallimore v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Barbara B. Bertschy-Gallimore
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mary Herrera et al v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
as 5:2014cv02455
Defendant:
Does and U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Mary Herrera and Michelle Herrera
Herrera et al v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
as 5:2014cv02454
Plaintiff:
Mary Herrera and Michelle Herrera
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Verhoek v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2014cv04821
Plaintiff:
Christina Verhoek
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neugebauer v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
as 3:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Tammy R. Neugebauer
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jordan v. US Bank National Association et al
as 0:2014cv01231
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce L Jordan
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609
Herron v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, a division of U.S. Bank National Association
as 5:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Tyler Herron
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, a division of U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
