Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Forbes-Roberts et al v. Dacor
as 1:2013cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony Forbes-Roberts and Victoria Forbes-Roberts
Defendant:
Dacor
Federal Home Mortgage Corp. v. Forbes
as 1:2012cv02590
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Mortgage Corp.
Defendant:
Edgerton Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Forbes et al v. SBG Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01250
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Forbes and Korin L Forbes
Defendant:
SBG Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, CitiMortgage Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Forbes v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Edgerton A. Forbes
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. and Pendergast & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jerome Clay et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Jerome Clay and Ronald A Forbes, Jr
Defendant:
Does and Federal National Mortgage Association
Forbes v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Forbes
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, New Century Mortgage Corporation, Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Windham vs City of Center, Texas etal
as 9:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Steve Windham
Defendant:
John Windham, Chuck Lunsford, Jim Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00409
Plaintiff:
Gwenyth D. Forbes
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharp v. Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Linda R. Sharp
Defendant:
Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina , Griggs & Co. Homes, Inc. , D. Ken Griggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ian Forbes
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC , CR Title Services, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
