Real Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 505
Alexander Sr. v. Ashland R. Medley et al., et al
as 1:2022cv21557
Plaintiff: Daniel H Alexander Sr.
Defendant: Ashland R. Medley et al., and HMC Asset, BSI, BLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Jessica Aber
as 22-1509
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Marriott Certificate of Assumed US Bounty #1014
Plaintiff: MEAGHAN COUCH, Marriott General Manager and BRITTANY ALEXANDER SALES
Defendant / Appellee: JESSICA D. ABER, U.S. Attorney, JOHN TUCKER FARNUM, ET ESQ, JEREME M. BROWN, O/F Police Alias and others
Bexar County, et al. v. Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00374
Plaintiff: Bexar County, et al.
Defendant: Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Additional Easement Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Lauderdale County, Tennessee, et al.
as 2:2022cv02163
Defendant: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority, Additional Easement Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Lauderdale County, Tennessee, and Miguel Perez Ortiz, et al., Additional Easement Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Lauderdale County, Tennessee and others
Jeffries v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al.
as 8:2022cv00527
Plaintiff: Monica Jeffries
Defendant: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al.
Urquhart v. Vandyk Mortgage Corporation, Et Al et al
as 1:2022cv00823
Plaintiff: Brandon Urquhart
Defendant: Vandyk Mortgage Corporation, Et Al, Diane Schupbach, James Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - (Other Contract)
United States of America v. Easements and Rights-of-Way, et al. (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, and United States of America
Defendant: Easements and Rights-of-Way, Etc., et al., Easements and Rights-of-Way, Martin E. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a Complaint in Condemnation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, v. Easements and Rights-of-Way, Etc., and Shirley Holcomb, et al. (TV2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
Defendant: Easements and Rights-of-Way, Etc., and Shirley Holcomb, et al., Shirley Holcomb and Mistie Ladd
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
NOBLE et al v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ET ALII et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00295
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, REGINALD C. NOBLE, REGINALD NOBLE, YHWH and others
Defendant: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ET ALII, OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ET ALII, CEO ANTHONY H. BANONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way, Etc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, and United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY, ETC., JAMES DARRELL WATSON, ET UX., An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.49 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Monroe County, Tennessee, James Darrell Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a Complaint in Condemnation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?