Cases 81 - 90 of 133
Kane et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Maureen A. Kane and Robert B. Daluz
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Opteum Financial Services, LLC, GRP Loan, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maureen E Goldsmith et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2012cv01544
Defendant:
Does and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Maureen E Goldsmith and Stephen R Goldsmith
Maureen E. Goldsmith et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2012cv01387
Defendant:
Does and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Maureen E. Goldsmith and Stephen R. Goldsmith
Gillis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2012cv10734
Plaintiff:
Maureen Gillis
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Postal Service v. Stephen R Goldsmith et al
as 8:2012cv00177
Defendant:
Maureen E Goldsmith and Stephen R Goldsmith
Plaintiff:
United States Postal Service
Wallace v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Wallace
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Wanda Harris, Michael Allen Barnes and others
Feaks v. Seterus
as 1:2011cv01118
Plaintiff:
Maureen Feaks
Defendant:
Seterus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ahler et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority (TV2)
as 3:2011cv00606
Plaintiff:
Julian Ahler , Diana Anderson , Lisa Anderson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority and Brenda L Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Ken McMaster, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-17489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEN MCMASTER, MAUREEN E. GALITZ and STEVEN E. FAWL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv03601
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Maureen Kersey
Plaintiff:
Dianna M. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
