Cases 1 - 8 of 8
USA v. Brooks
as 3:2022cv02536
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Crystal D. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. The Estate of LaFawn J. Brooks, Deceased et al
as 1:2014cv01738
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC, Aaron D Brooks, Dynamic Strategies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Brooks v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Marshall D. Brooks, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Flagstar Bank, FSB and Surety Trustees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Brooke et al
as 1:2012cv01326
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jennifer R Brooke, Estate of Samuel D. Brooke and Hometown National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ackerman et al v. ExxonMobil Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv03442
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ackerman , Roxanna M. Guinan , Jeffrey Guinan and others
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation and John R. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MIDFIRST BANK v. ALFORD et al
as 5:2011cv00346
Plaintiff:
MIDFIRST BANK
Defendant:
CRAIG ALFORD, ROBIN ALFORD, MICHAEL C DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 2.87 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County et al
as 2:2007cv02397
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
2.87 acres of permanent easement located in Maricopa County, 2.87 acres of temporary construction easement located in Maricopa County, 3.45 acres of permanent access road easement located in Maricopa County and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Brooks et al
as 1:2007cv01938
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Gloria A Brooks and Ronald D. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
