Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hackford v. United States Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00700
Defendant: Mark Lee Greenblat, Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff: Richita Marie Hackford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Hucul et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv01750
Defendant: United States of America, Bureau of Land Management, Director Tracy Stone-Manning and others
Plaintiff: Judy Hucul and Michael Hucul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Pelley v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al.
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff: Jacob Pelley, As Trustee of the Bradley Pierce Brown Trust and Jacob Pelley
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Paula Johnson-Muic, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
True Oil, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-8082
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRUE OIL, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company and TRUE RANCHES, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DUANE SPENCER, in his official capacity as Wyoming Bureau of Land Management Deputy State Director, JOHN ELLIOTT, in his official capacity as Acting Field Manager of the Rawlins Field Office, High Desert District and others
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35587
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35569
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
State of South Carolina et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03651
Plaintiff: State of South Carolina and South Carolina Department of Administration
Defendant: Deb Haaland, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Baker Ranches, Inc., et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15846
Plaintiff / Appellant: BAKER RANCHES, INC., DAVID JOHN ELDRIDGE, RUTH ELDRIDGE, as Co-Trustees of the David John Eldridge and Ruth Eldridge Family Living Trust dated January 31, 2007 and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHAWN BENGE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Baker Ranches, Inc., et al v. Deb Haaland, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15765
Plaintiff / Appellee: BAKER RANCHES, INC., DAVID JOHN ELDRIDGE, RUTH ELDRIDGE, as Co-Trustees of the David John Eldridge and Ruth Eldridge Family Living Trust dated January 31, 2007 and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHAWN BENGE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Temple v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv05033
Plaintiff: Curtis Temple
Defendant: Deb Haaland, LaCounte Darryl, Timothy LaPointe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?