Cases 1 - 8 of 8
USA v. Burns et al
as 5:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Douglas L. Burns, Unknown Spouse of Douglas L. Burns, Erin A. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Rohrs, Dona Powell, United Telephone Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Commissioner:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Burns et al v. Deutsche Bank et al
as 1:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
Carolyn L. Burns and Dennis J. Burns
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Burns et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Edgar L. Burns, Jr. and Melanie Burns
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
as 3:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Burns
Defendant:
Ocwen Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BURNS
as 1:2010cv00062
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RHONIE L. BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BURNS
as 1:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RHONIE L. BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee of Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-X2 Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated June 24 v. Burns et al
as 4:2007cv01081
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee of Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-X2 Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated June 24
Defendant:
David S. Burns and Valerie L. Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
