Cases 1 - 7 of 7
POTTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
ZILDJIAN POTTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, MUTUAL OF OMAHA MORTGAGE, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Diamond v. First National Bank of Arizona et al
as 2:2014cv00975
Plaintiff:
George Diamond
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Mutual of Omaha Bank v. Govin et al
as 3:2012cv00863
Plaintiff:
Mutual of Omaha Bank
Defendant:
Amit Govin, Greg Posmantur and The Heartwood Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuentes et al v. Kondaur Capital Corporation et al
as 8:2009cv02350
Plaintiff:
Asael Fuentes and Nora Fuentes
Defendant:
Kondaur Capital Corporation, East-West Mortgage, Inc., Mutual of Omaha Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lemberg v. US Bankruptcy Court et al
as 1:2009cv00666
Plaintiff:
Ann Lemberg
Defendant:
US Bankruptcy Court and Mutual of Omaha Bank
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.024 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.029 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-02-1165 et al
as 2:2009cv01041
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.024 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.029 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-02-1165, RUSSELL MAYNARD, BETH ANN MAYNARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matt Construction v. Spanish Park, LLC et al.,
as 2:2009cv00454
Plaintiff:
Matt Construction, LLC and Matt Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Spanish Park, LLC, WCP Properties 2, LLC, FDIC, as Receiver for First National Bank of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
