Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Northern Natural Gas Company v. Lounsbury et al
as 4:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Defendant:
Benjamin Lee Lounsbury, Jean Ann Lounsbury, Big Run Farms, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Northern Natural Gas Company v. Donnelly Farms Limited Partnership
as 4:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Defendant:
Donnelly Farms Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Northern Natural Gas Company v. Township 99N, Range 22 West Section 29: SW/4 SE/4 et al
as 3:2022cv03044
Plaintiff:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Defendant:
0.0161 acres, more or less, located in Township 99N, Range 22 West Section 29: SW/4 SE/4, 0.1676 acres, more or less, located in Township 99N, Range 22 West Section 29: SE/4 SW/4, Arlyn D. Tenold, as Trustees of the Arlyn and Judith Tenold Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Northern Natural Gas Company v. Tract No. LI 246 et al
as 4:2021cv04144
Plaintiff:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Defendant:
Tract No. LI 246, Howard D. Van De Vendel, Edna Van De Vendel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Northern Natural Gas Company v. Tract No. LI 246 et al
as 4:2021cv04144
Plaintiff:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Defendant:
Tract No. LI 246, Howard D. Van De Vendel, Edna Van De Vendel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County, Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00328
Defendant:
80 Acres of Land in Thurston County, Nebraska, Patricia E. Abatangelo, Christine Marie Solomon and others
Plaintiff:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Vee Bar, Ltd. et al v. Northern Natural Gas Company
as 4:2016cv00015
Defendant:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Plaintiff:
Pigmon & Daughters, Ltd. and Vee Bar, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3278
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
APPROXIMATELY 9117 ACRES IN PRATT, KINGMAN, AND RE TRACT NO. 1062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 2062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less, located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 3062710, containing 160.00 acres more or less, located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein other PL/EL/TL-3062710 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NASH OIL AND GAS DEFENDANTS, PRATT WELL SERVICE DEFENDANTS, VAL ENERGY DEFENDANTS and others
Defendant Counterclaimant:
JANDIE OIL CO., INC., IVAN W. MILTON, LISA M. MILTON and others
Defendant:
STULL & BEVERLIN, LLC
:
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3285
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
MEIRIES LANDOWNER GROUP
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3286
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
TRACT NO. 1012711, containing 159.88 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein other PL/EL/TL-1012711, TRACT NO. 1032711, containing 139.04 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 1042711, containing 159.40 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein and others
Defendant Counterclaimant:
PAUL J. BEAVER, L.D. DAVIS, CARL DUDREY and others
Defendant:
KENNETH GLENN, STULL & BEVERLIN, LLC, APPROXIMATELY 9117 ACRES IN PRATT, KINGMAN, AND RE TRACT NO. 1062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
