Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,892
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Sublease Interest Obtained Pursuant to an Assign., et al
as 24-7089
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation, (Amtrak)
Defendant: Sublease Interest Obtained Pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Leasehold Interest Made as of January 25, 2007, with said property interest pertaining to described leasehold interests at Washington Union Station, Union Station Sole Member, LLC, Unknown Owners and others
Muhammad et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv04602
Plaintiff: Ronald Muhammad and Wilhelmenia T. Muhammad
Defendant: Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Codilis & Associates, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak) v. Odemns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01358
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak)
Defendant: Raymond E Odemns, Jr, .. NationsCredit Financial Services Corporation, UMLIC VP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
US v. Arlington County, Virginia
as 24-1412
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FIBERLIGHT, LLC, 8.929 ACRES OF LAND IN ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA and others
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 17.697 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant: 17.697 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, James W. Granbery, James Treanor Granbery, III and others
Counter Defendant: Tianda Tavares
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP v. Isaac et al
as 5:2024cv00380
Defendant: Phillips Gas Company, Harold Isaac, Karen Isaac and others
Plaintiff: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
The Central Trust Bank v. Edwardsville Health Properties, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00522
Plaintiff: The Central Trust Bank
Defendant: Edwardsville Health Properties, LLC, Edwardsville Care Center, LLC, University Health Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods in Twsp. 149, et al
as 24-1693
Plaintiff: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: 189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 227.8 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: N1/2SW1/4, W1/2SE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 242.0 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 2: SW1/4SE1/4 Section 11: NE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across and others
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4 et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4, 2.92 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: N/2SW/4, 1.45 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: S/2SW/4 with exception and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?