Cases 101 - 110 of 130
McElroy v. St Jude Medical Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth W McElroy
Defendant:
St Jude Medical Inc and Pacesetter Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richard et al v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Roni Richard and Michael Richard
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rouse v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv02396
Plaintiff:
Gary Rouse
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keaton v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01968
Plaintiff:
Connie J. Keaton
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houlette v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01785
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Houlette
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pinsonneault v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01717
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Pinsonneault
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reo v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10339
Plaintiff:
Vicki J Reo
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dettrey et al v. St. Judes Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01737
Plaintiff:
James Dettrey and Linda Dettrey
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical S.C. Inc. and St. Judes Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Viserta v. St Jude Medical Inc
as 8:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dolores Viserta
Defendant:
St Jude Medical Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keir-Womble v. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv14180
Plaintiff:
Felicia Keir-Womble
Defendant:
Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. and St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
