Cases 121 - 130 of 211
LABADIE et al v. SEXTON et al
as 1:2016cv03373
Plaintiff:
AMY LABADIE and STEVE LABADIE
Defendant:
NEW PRIME, INC. and JOHN SEXTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Fantry et al v. Costa
as 1:2016cv12466
Plaintiff:
Jane Fantry and Jack Fantry
Defendant:
Paulo Costa , New Prime, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Friess v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01397
Plaintiff:
Lorie Ann Friess
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. and Gene L. Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
TOCZEK et al v. YOUNG et al
as 5:2016cv06262
Plaintiff:
KYONG TOCZEK and MICHAEL TOCZEK
Defendant:
LEE FREDERICK YOUNG and NEW PRIME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meltinos et al v. Botts et al
as 1:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
James Meltinos and Angela Meltinos
Defendant:
Richard Botts , New Prime Inc and American Moving and Storage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Hudson et al
as 3:2016cv01708
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Evans and Raymond P. Evans
Defendant:
Rodolfo V. Hudson and New Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESPINAL v. NEW PRIME INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04868
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO J ESPINAL
Defendant:
CRAIG A TREON , NEW PRIME, INC. , PRIME, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cheshire v. Edwards et al
as 4:2016cv12687
Plaintiff:
Tina Cheshire
Defendant:
Simon Edwards and New Prime, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heard v. Loughney et al
as 1:2016cv00487
Plaintiff:
Paris Heard
Defendant:
Michael Loughney and New Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tafoya et al v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00458
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc. , Jeremy Scudder and New Mexico Department of Transportation
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Tafoya , Nicolas Leger , Rachel Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
