Cases 11 - 20 of 163
Reinbold v. Advance Auto Parts Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00605
Plaintiff:
Janice Reinbold
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Blackmer Pump Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Blackmer Pump Company , Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Burkart v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv12646
Plaintiff:
Raymond V. Burkart, Jr.
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc. , Ameron International Corporation , Anco Insulations Inc and others
Third_party_defendant:
Flowserve Corporation, Crane Company, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross_claimant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross_defendant:
Ameron International Corporation , Anco Insulations Inc , Eagle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv06368
Defendant:
National Automotive Parts Association, Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Cleaver Brooks Inc and others
Cross Defendant:
Anco Insulations Inc, IMO Industries Inc, Ingersoll Rand Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Wyeth Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Hayden and Thomas H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HOSANG v. AGCO CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv02061
Defendant:
AGCO CORP. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DONNA HOSANG
Cross_claimant:
DEMING PUMPS , CARRIER CORPORATION , ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
AGCO CORP. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant:
Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant:
Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant:
Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hollingsworth et al v. Hercules, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lee Hollingsworth and Scott Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Hercules, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv02275
Defendant:
National Automotive Parts Association, Avondale Industries, Inc., Chevron Oronite Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Hayden and Thomas H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ellis v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00140
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, Ameron International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ellis
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , The Gorman-Rupp Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Co. , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Birlie Smith v. The Boeing Company
as 14-3007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Birlie Smith, Individually and as the Surviving Heir of Ronald Smith, Sr., Deceased
Defendant:
3M Company, Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc., individually and as Successor in Interest to McDonnell Douglas, BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The Boeing Company
Smith v 3 M Company, et al
as 4:2014cv01200
Defendant:
Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc. , The Boeing Company , BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
Birlie Smith
Cross_claimant:
Pneumo Abex, LLC , Brand Insulations Inc. , Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
Pneumo Abex, LLC , BP Amoco Chemical Company , BTL Specialty Resins Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
