Cases 21 - 30 of 185
COYLE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 2:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
DANIEL COYLE and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (AMTRAK)
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Coyle v. DJD Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv12048
Plaintiff:
Peter Coyle
Defendant:
DJD Medical, Inc., Domenic J Dinardo, Medical Device Business Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COYLE et al v. NORDIC TRACK, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv20277
Plaintiff:
LORI COYLE and MICHAEL COYLE
Defendant:
NORDIC TRACK, INC., HEALTH RIDER, INC., ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
KURT ANDREW COYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT COYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coyle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04824
Plaintiff:
Brian Coyle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEARD v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01906
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
COYLE BEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIE v. MACE HUGHES et al
as 3:2021cv13626
Plaintiff:
JANICE L. DIE
Defendant:
PAIGE L. MACE HUGHES and KELLY PFEIFFER COYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beard v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv03744
Plaintiff:
COYLE BEARD
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coyle v. Koelewyn
as 2:2021cv01618
Defendant:
Kristopher E. Koelewyn
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Coyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
