Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Romero et al v. Panther Helicopters, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02049
Plaintiff: Joel Travis Romero and Kim B Romero
Defendant: Panther Helicopters, Inc. , Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and EPL Oil & Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Epling v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08427
Plaintiff: Loretta Dawn Epling
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrigan et al v. M/V AMC AMBASSADOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv03208
Plaintiff: Michael Carrigan
Defendant: M/V AMC AMBASSADOR, EMAS-AMC, Inc. , Cross Group Inc and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: EMAS-AMC, Inc.
Third_party_defendant: Southern States Brokerage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Epling et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22234
Plaintiff: Charles E. Epling and Gloria D. Epling
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Epling et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv12651
Plaintiff: Brandy Epling and Kevin Epling
Defendant: Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldridoe et al v. Taylor et al
as 7:2010cv00035
Plaintiff: Monty Baldridoe and Tonie Baldridoe
Defendant: Jeremy T. Taylor
Intervenor_plaintiff: Teresa Epling
Intervenor_defendant: Jeremy T. Taylor and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Hobbs v. Epling
as 1:2009cv00050
Plaintiff: Nancy A. Hobbs
Defendant: Ken Epling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Epling v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2009cv20553
Plaintiff: Gary D. Epling
Defendant: NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?