Cases 21 - 30 of 35
McKoy v. Potter
as 1:2008cv09428
Plaintiff:
Jerome McKoy
Defendant:
John E. Potter, National Association of Letter Carriers AFL-CIO(union) and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Farve v. US Post Master Gen
as 08-31070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAOMI E FARVE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, United States Post Master General
McGuire et al v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2008cv01580
Plaintiff:
Edward C. McGuire and Debbie McGuire
Defendant:
United States Of America, The United States Postal Service and John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Miller v. Potter
as 3:2008cv00526
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Miller
Defendant:
John E Potter
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tracey Williams v. Postmaster General
as 08-1725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACEY JO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL, John E. Potter
Velazquez-Linares v. United States Government, et al
as 08-1548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA VELAZQUEZ-LINARES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, Government, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General and others
James Elder v. John Potter
as 08-55379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General United States Postal Service
Velazquez-Linares v. United States Government et al
as 3:2008cv01267
Plaintiff:
Maria Velazquez-Linares
Defendant:
United States Government, U.S. Postal Services, John E. Potter and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Robbins v. Potter
as 1:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marilyn K. Robbins
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PRISCO v. POTTER et al
as 2:2007cv06166
Plaintiff:
MARCALLE PRISCO
Defendant:
JOHN E. POTTER, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
