Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Wooten et al v. United Auto Delivery and Recovery, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Mae Wooten , Mary Jean Davis , Billy Jones and others
Defendant:
United Auto Delivery and Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davies v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv05306
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Davies
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv05875
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Davis and James R. Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCallum-Davis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20453
Plaintiff:
Mary McCallum-Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21791
Plaintiff:
Mary D. Davis and Larry Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Candacy Roberts-Anderson et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02355
Plaintiff:
Candacy Roberts-Anderson , Cheryl Faulkner , Rose Flores and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Candacy Roberts-Anderson et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01904
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Barnes, Toby Barnes, Linda Black and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Davis-Hughes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07291
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Davis-Hughes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01249
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Davis and Jerry Davis
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31028
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
