Cases 21 - 30 of 42
i: a man aggrieved; prosecutor v. Rodriguez et al
as 8:2015cv02775
Plaintiff:
i: a man aggrieved; prosecutor
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez and Eric Glass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DiMatteo v. Raymond et al
as 1:2015cv00066
Defendant:
Raymond, Mr. John Thomas Raymond, Mr. Kevin Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
DiMatteo and Deborah DiMatteo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coombes v. Kansas City Aviation Department et al
as 4:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Coombes
Defendant:
Kansas City Aviation Department, Kansas City Airport Police, Firstline Transportation Security, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Nabil Farag v. Raymond Vatne, Jr., et al
as 12-35717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NABIL W. FARAG
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND TOM VATNE, Jr., THURSTON COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
John Kenney v. Japan, et al
as 12-55780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. KENNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAPAN, AKA Japan, Inc., THE NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION, TOTTORI PREFECTURAL POLICE and others
Staton v. Dobyns-Gross et al
as 2:2012cv00789
Plaintiff:
Gerald W Staton
Defendant:
Dawn M Dobyns-Gross, Tippecanoe, County of, Tippecanoe County Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv05341
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Kyoto Young Womens Academy:
Kyoto Jyosei Gakuin
John Kenney v. Japan, et al
as 11-55350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. KENNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAPAN, AKA Japan, Inc., THE NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION, TOTTORI PREFECTURAL POLICE and others
John B Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv00630
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Somers v. Clayton, Township of et al
as 2:2010cv11123
Plaintiff:
Susan Caroline Somers
Defendant:
Clayton, Township of , Clayton Township Police Department , Dale Jones and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
