Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Valle et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00798
Plaintiff:
Deanna Valle , Roberta Adams , April Avent and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valle et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01706
Plaintiff:
Deanna Valle , Roberta Adams , April Avent and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv06440
Plaintiff:
Judith L. Smith and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2015cv03058
Plaintiff:
JUDITH L. SMITH and RAYMOND SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC and ETHICON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christensen et al v. Target
as 0:2014cv03208
Plaintiff:
Nellie Christensen , Stephanie Wright , Jennifer Christensen and others
Defendant:
Target , Visa and MasterCard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31443
Plaintiff:
Rida Smith and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv24582
Plaintiff:
Virginia Smith and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 1:2011cv05178
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41363
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34128
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SMITH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
