Cases 31 - 40 of 23,686
(PS) Nguyen v. Lap
as 2:2024cv02141
Defendant:
Tan Thanh Lap
Plaintiff:
Quoc H. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wrice v. HZ Props RE, LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv07047
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Wrice
Defendant:
HZ Props RE, LTD., Z & H FOODS, INC. and HZ Ops Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ketchens et al v. Robinson
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Gretchen H. Ketchens and Charles Donald Ketchens
Defendant:
Faith Yu-Ing Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Coyne v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
James H. Coyne
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Elkind et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv05851
Plaintiff:
Marie and Michael Elkind
Defendant:
CVS Albany, LLC i/s/h/a CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Waks v. A&H Security Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00951
Defendant:
Tammy Kulzer and A&H Security Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joel Waks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Howard v. CNC Oilfield Services, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
Shinette H. Howard, Hershell Davis Ellis and CNC Oilfield Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Walid Abdulla v. BOP, et al
as 24-2319
Defendant:
WILLIAM WATSON, Doctor, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
WALID H. ABDULLA
Bain v. Clayman
as 0:2024cv61375
Defendant:
Federal Attorney Eric H. Clayman
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
L. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv04526
Plaintiff:
H. L.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
