Cases 31 - 40 of 224
Harris v. Peak et al
as 1:2021cv04405
Plaintiff:
Javonne Harris
Defendant:
Jordan Peak and Insituform Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PEAKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61860
Plaintiff:
CHARLES N PEAKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEAK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv17601
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
NANCY PEAK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEAKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52785
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PEAKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kalra v. Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00712
Defendant:
Kai-Lin Chuang, Haida Investments Ltd, Byte Consulting and others
Plaintiff:
Aashish Kalra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEAK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22407
Plaintiff:
STACY NICHOLE PEAK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peak et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01857
Plaintiff:
Gerald Peak and Souksanam Peak
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz Berbey v. Kit et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Highland Student Housing Holdings, LLC, Everest Campus Services Company, LLC, Peak Campus Companies, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Yelena Ortiz Berbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tackett v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 9:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Jay Mahoney, Mark Hardin, Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Tackett and Kaitlyn Owen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
