Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,368
Bristol v Ford Motor Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01649
Defendant: Pneumo Abex LLC, Ford Motor Company, Arvinmeritor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Nola H. Bristol and Gene B. Bristol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Cox, Sr. v. AGCO Corporation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00084
Defendant: AGCO Corporation, Star Machine & Tool, SPX Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Cox, Sr, Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Valerie M. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Harrison et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00740
Defendant: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc, Genuine Parts Company, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Harrison, Donna Lee Harrison and Jerry Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rivera v. CBS Corporation
as 6:2015cv06761
Defendant: CBS Corporation , Foster Wheeler LLC , Advance Auto Parts and others
Plaintiff: Maurice Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rivera v. CBS Corporation
as 1:2015cv01051
Defendant: CBS Corporation , Foster Wheeler LLC , Advance Auto Parts and others
Plaintiff: Maurice Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell et al v. Atwood & Morrill Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00958
Plaintiff: Jimmy R. Mitchell and Connie Mitchell
Defendant: Atwood & Morrill Co. , Carrier Corporation , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Warren Pumps LLC, Honeywell International, Inc. , Gardner Denver, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Warren Pumps LLC , Atwood & Morrill Co. , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Diaz et al v. Georgia Pacific, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv02116
Plaintiff: Joseph Diaz and Melba Diaz
Defendant: Georgia Pacific, LLC , Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant: CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant: Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant: Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant: Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff: James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant: Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?