Cases 41 - 50 of 79
POSSUMATO et al v. JONES
as 2:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
RICHARD POSSUMATO, JR. and GINA POSSUMATO
Defendant:
LOUIS B. JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. MasterBrand Cabinets Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02269
Plaintiff:
David B Jones
Defendant:
Masterbrand Cabinets Inc and Bryan S Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv00961
Plaintiff:
Chantal B. Jones , Quincy Jones, Jr. and Asanna Bishop
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McKinley v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. McKinley
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Jones and Stewart B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones v. United States of America Defendant Steven Lorsch terminated per Order at 7
as 6:2012cv02086
Plaintiff:
Robert B Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Shirtz v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2012cv01553
Plaintiff:
Donna T. Shirtz
Defendant:
County of Onondaga and Willie B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bettron B. Jones v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04121
Plaintiff:
Bettron B. Jones
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Bettron B. Jones v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07947
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bettron B. Jones
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55287
Plaintiff:
GEORGE B. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51941
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH B. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
