Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Duong v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv01864
Plaintiff:
David Duong
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Phan v. Tremblay
as 0:2014cv61720
Plaintiff:
Duong Phan
Defendant:
Michel Tremblay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hung Duong v. ITT Educational Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02653
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong
Defendant:
ITT Educational Services, Inc. , Sam Russell and Allison Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duong v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv16637
Plaintiff:
Myle Duong
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duong v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2014cv02234
Plaintiff:
Jenny Duong
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Scott A. Keszler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Eng L Mong et al v. La Ronya Hines et al
as 2:2013cv03070
Defendant:
Robin Blake, Michael C Brannan, Wanda W Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Meng and Eng L Mong
Duong et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as 2:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
Kong Duong , Tam Le , Ngoc Nguyen and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc., Danos and Curole Marine Contractors, L.L.C., DRC Emergency Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bobinger et al v. TIN, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bobinger, Sr. , Dianne E. Dixon , Albert J. Grelle, Sr. and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc. and International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abadie et al
as 2:2010cv02116
Plaintiff:
Al Abadie, Jr. , Don Abadie , Ralph Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duong et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07893
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Von Duong, Von Duong, Von Duong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
