Cases 41 - 50 of 52
COOPER v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67441
Plaintiff:
OSCAR J. COOPER
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37724
Plaintiff:
JULIAN J COOPER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Cooper et al v. Alexander et al
as 3:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Barbara J Cooper and LaJoy Cooper
Defendant:
Charlie Alexander, Greyhound Lines Inc , Bekir Osmicevic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cooper et al v. Alexander et al
as 4:2010cv01974
Plaintiff:
Barbara J Cooper and LaJoy Cooper
Defendant:
Charlie Alexander, Greyhound Lines Inc, Bekir Osmicevic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COOPER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40228
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND J. COOPER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COOPER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70099
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND J. COOPER
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv65941
Plaintiff:
MARY J. COOPER and WILLIE B. COOPER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXITALLIC, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88402
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. COOPER and AUDREY COOPER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Glowacki v. Cooper et al
as 1:2009cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kathy Glowacki and Kathy Glowacki
Defendant:
Carl J Cooper and Sarnia Paving Stone, LTD
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cooper v. Target Corporation
as 4:2008cv40192
Plaintiff:
Marc J Cooper
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
